[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459367049.2903.7.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:44:09 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>, dima.ruinskiy@...el.com
Cc: Steve Shih <sshih@...co.com>, danielwa@...o99.com,
xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] drivers: net: ethernet: intel: e1000e: fix ethtool
autoneg off for fiber
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:34 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> So Intel maintainers (Jeff, Jesse, Shannon, Carolyn, Don, Bruce, and
> John)
>
> I'm assuming no comments means this patch is acceptable , and I willÂ
> resubmit it without the RFC. Is that acceptable ?
I personally do not see an issue with the patch, go ahead and submit it
as a non-RFC and I will make sure that the e1000e maintainer (Dima
Ruinskly) reviews it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists