netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: fec: stop the "rcv is not +last, " error messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56FC7A96.9070002@uclinux.org>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:17:10 +1000
From:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
To:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:	Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: stop the "rcv is not +last, " error messages

Hi Fabio,

On 31/03/16 04:37, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org> wrote:
>> Hi Troy,
>>
>> Commit 55cd48c8 ('net: fec: stop the "rcv is not +last, " error
>> messages') adds a write to a register that is not present in all
>> implementations of the FEC hardware module. None of the ColdFire
>> SoC parts with the FEC module have the FTRL (0x1b0) register.
>>
>> Does this need a quirk flag to key access to this register of?
>> Or can you piggyback on the FEC_QUIRK_HAS_RACC flag?
> 
> Would the change below work on Coldfire?
> 
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -943,8 +943,8 @@ fec_restart(struct net_device *ndev)
>                 else
>                         val &= ~FEC_RACC_OPTIONS;
>                 writel(val, fep->hwp + FEC_RACC);
> -       }
>         writel(PKT_MAXBUF_SIZE, fep->hwp + FEC_FTRL);
> +       }
>  #endif
> 
>         /*

Yes, that fixes it. Will you carry this change?

Regards
Greg