netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] sock: document timestamping via cmsg in Documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADAM+B27_CEO-H26YZ=2jHtEE=KyfP_=iFHpv6CvPFeNTnxTZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:53:42 -0400
From:	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.kdev@...il.com>
To:	Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@...vell.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] sock: document timestamping via cmsg in Documentation

Hi Lino,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@...vell.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 31.03.2016 00:37, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh wrote:
>
>> +
>> +Moreover, applications must still enable timestamp reporting via
>> +setsockopt to receive timestamps:
>> +
>> +  u32 val = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE |
>
>
> would not __u32 be more appropriate for userspace?

Sure, I thought u32 would be better for brevity in documentation. I
will s/u32/__u32/g in the doc for the next version.

Thanks,
Soheil

>
> Regards,
> Lino