[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459525463.6473.278.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 08:44:23 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.kdev@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, willemb@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, ncardwell@...gle.com,
kafai@...com, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/8] tcp: accept SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID for
passive TFO
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 11:04 -0400, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh wrote:
> From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
>
> SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID is set to get data-independent IDs
> to associate timestamps with send calls. For TCP connections,
> tp->snd_una is used as the starting point to calculate
> relative IDs.
>
> This socket option will fail if set before the handshake on a
> passive TCP fast open connection with data in SYN or SYN/ACK,
> since setsockopt requires the connection to be in the
> ESTABLISHED state.
>
> To address these, instead of limiting the option to the
> ESTABLISHED state, accept the SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID option as
> long as the connection is not in LISTEN or CLOSE states.
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists