[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1459474618.3751123.565321858.30DF1858@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:36:58 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sasha.levin@...cle.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, mkubecek@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] tcp: various missing rcu_read_lock around
__sk_dst_get
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 03:19, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> As you can see, release_sock() messes badly lockdep (once your other
> patches are in )
>
> Once we properly fix release_sock() and/or __release_sock(), all these
> false positives disappear.
This was a loopback connection. I need to study release_sock and
__release_sock more as I cannot currently see an issue with the lockdep
handling.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists