[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160401144131.GG17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:11:31 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] samples/bpf: Enable powerpc support
On 2016/03/31 10:52AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 3/31/16 4:25 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> ...
> >+
> >+#ifdef __powerpc__
> >+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) { (ip) = (ctx)->link; }
> >+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx)
> >+#else
> >+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) \
> >+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx))
> >+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) \
> >+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), \
> >+ (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip)))
>
> makes sense, but please use ({ }) gcc extension instead of {} and
> open call to make sure that macro body is scoped.
To be sure I understand this right, do you mean something like this?
+
+#ifdef __powerpc__
+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = (ctx)->link; })
+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP
+#else
+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ \
+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx)); })
+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ \
+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), \
+ (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip))); })
+#endif
+
Thanks,
Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists