lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459622455.18188.5.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Sat, 02 Apr 2016 20:40:55 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, tom@...bertland.com,
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, gerlitz@...lanox.com,
	daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] mlx4: add support for fast rx drop bpf program

On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 18:21 -0700, Brenden Blanco wrote:

> +static int mlx4_bpf_set(struct net_device *dev, int fd)
> +{
[...]
> +		if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_PHYS_DEV) {
> +			bpf_prog_put(prog);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}

Why wouldn't this check be done in the generic code that calls
ndo_bpf_set()?

johannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ