lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:41:45 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: ipv4: Consider failed nexthops in
 multipath routes

On 4/3/16 3:57 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> 	Hello,
>
> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016, David Ahern wrote:
>
>> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
>> @@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ fwmark_reflect - BOOLEAN
>>   	fwmark of the packet they are replying to.
>>   	Default: 0
>>
>> +fib_multipath_use_neigh - BOOLEAN
>> +	Use status of existing neighbor entry when determining nexthop for
>> +	multipath routes. If disabled neighbor information is not used and
>
> 	Comma from v3 is removed?
>
>> +	packets could be directed to a failed nexthop. Only valid for kernels
>
>> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
>>   void fib_select_multipath(struct fib_result *res, int hash)
>>   {
>>   	struct fib_info *fi = res->fi;
>> +	struct net *net = fi->fib_net;
>> +	bool first = false;
>>
>>   	for_nexthops(fi) {
>>   		if (hash > atomic_read(&nh->nh_upper_bound))
>>   			continue;
>>
>> -		res->nh_sel = nhsel;
>> -		return;
>> +		if (!net->ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_use_neigh ||
>> +		    fib_good_nh(nh)) {
>> +			res->nh_sel = nhsel;
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>> +		if (!first) {
>> +			res->nh_sel = nhsel;
>> +			first = true;
>> +		}
>>   	} endfor_nexthops(fi);
>>
>>   	/* Race condition: route has just become dead. */
>
> 	The 'res->nh_sel = 0;' that is here should be
> removed because it invalidates the above assignment.
>

right. will send a v5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists