[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160404122219.GD21828@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:22:19 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Charles-Antoine Couret <charles-antoine.couret@...vision.fr>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Marvell phy: add fiber status check for some components
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:45:42AM +0200, Charles-Antoine Couret wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Shouldn't you return to page 0, i.e. MII_M1111_COPPER, under all
> > conditions?
>
> I return marvell_read_status() which returns 0 if it hasn't error during the process.
> In case of right conditions, my function returns 0 for COPPER part (and FIBER part too).
>
> It doesn't change the value returned and behavior.
Hi Charles
Please read my email again. I'm talking about the phy page, not the
function return value.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists