lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 04:13:13 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: dsa: mv88e6131: HW bridging support
 for 6185

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:53:40PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> All packets passing through a switch of the 6185 family are currently all
> directed to the CPU port. This means that port bridging is software driven.
> 
> To enable hardware bridging for this switch family, we need to implement the
> port mapping operations, the FDB operations, and optionally the VLAN operations
> (for 802.1Q and VLAN filtering aware systems).
> 
> However this family only has 256 FDBs indexed by 8-bit identifiers, opposed to
> 4096 FDBs with 12-bit identifiers for other families such as 6352. It also
> doesn't have dedicated FID registers for ATU and VTU operations.
> 
> This patchset fixes these differences, and enable hardware bridging for 6185.

Hi Vivien

I added a test for in chip 6185 bridging, and it worked as expected.

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

	   Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ