[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:37:37 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] net_sched: fix a memory leak in tc action
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:32 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> Fixes: ddf97ccdd7cb ("net_sched: add network namespace support for tc actions")
>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>> Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/act_api.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
>> index 2a19fe1..03e322b 100644
>> --- a/include/net/act_api.h
>> +++ b/include/net/act_api.h
>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ void tcf_hashinfo_destroy(const struct tc_action_ops *ops,
>> static inline void tc_action_net_exit(struct tc_action_net *tn)
>> {
>> tcf_hashinfo_destroy(tn->ops, tn->hinfo);
>> + kfree(tn->hinfo);
>> }
>>
>> int tcf_generic_walker(struct tc_action_net *tn, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> Looks good to me, although the kfree() might be put in
> cf_hashinfo_destroy() (at one place instead of being inlined in all call
> points)
Putting it in tc_action_net_exit() makes it symmetric with tc_action_net_init().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists