lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:45:02 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net 3/4] ipv6: datagram: Update dst cache of a
 connected datagram sk during pmtu update

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
> One thing to note is that this patch uses the addresses from the sk
> instead of iph when updating sk->sk_dst_cache.  It is basically the
> same logic that the __ip6_datagram_connect() is doing, so some
> refactoring works in the first two patches.
>
> AFAIK, a UDP socket can become connected after sending out some
> datagrams in un-connected state.  or It can be connected
> multiple times to different destinations.  I did some quick
> tests but I could be wrong.
>
> I am thinking if there could be a chance that the skb->data, which
> has the original outgoing iph, is not related to the current
> connected address.  If it is possible, we have to specifically
> use the addresses in the sk instead of skb->data (i.e. iph) when
> updating the sk->sk_dst_cache.
>
> If we need to use the sk addresses (and other info) to find out a
> new dst for a connected udp socket, it is better not doing it while
> the userland is connecting to somewhere else.
>
> If the above case is impossible, we can keep using the info from iph to
> do the dst update for a connected-udp sk without taking the lock.

I see your point, but calling __ip6_datagram_connect() seems overkill
here, we don't need to update so many things in the pmtu update context,
at least IPv4 doesn't do that either. I don't think you have to do that.

So why just updating the dst cache (also some addr cache) here is not
enough?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ