[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57041AFA.5090702@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 23:07:22 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com, richard.alpe@...csson.com,
ying.xue@...driver.com, maloy@...jonn.com,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tipc: reduce transmission rate of reset
messages when link is down
Hello.
On 04/05/2016 07:20 PM, Jon Maloy wrote:
> When a link is down, it will continuously try to re-establish contact
> with the peer by sending out a RESET or and ACTIVATE message at each
And/or?
> timeout interval. The default value for this interval is currently
> 375 ms. This is wasteful, and may become a problem in very large
> clusters with dozens or hundereds of nodes being down simultaneously.
Hundreds.
> We now introduce a simple backoff algorithm for these cases. The
> first five messages are sent at default rate; thereafter a message
> is sent only each 16't timer interval.
16th?
> This will cover the vast majority of link recyling cases, since the
Recycling.
> endpoint starting last will transmit at the higher speed, and the link
> should normally be established well be before the rate needs to be
> reduced.
>
> The only case where we will see a degradation of link re-establishment
> is when the endpoins remain intact, and a glitch in the transmission
Endpoints.
> media is causing the link reset. We will then experience a worst-case
> re-establishing time of 6 seconds, something we deem acceptable.
>
> Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists