lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160406.172008.266926707628676037.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:20:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, fugang.duan@....com, lznuaa@...il.com,
	fabio.estevam@....com, l.stach@...gutronix.de, andrew@...n.ch,
	tremyfr@...il.com, gerg@...inux.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
	stillcompiling@...il.com, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
	arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 05/16] net: fec: reduce interrupts

From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
Date: Tue,  5 Apr 2016 19:25:51 -0700

> By clearing the NAPI interrupts in the NAPI routine
> and not in the interrupt handler, we can reduce the
> number of interrupts. We also don't need any status
> variables as the registers are still valid.
> 
> Also, notice that if budget pkts are received, the
> next call to fec_enet_rx_napi will now continue to
> receive the previously pending packets.
> 
> To test that this actually reduces interrupts, try
> this command before/after patch
> 
> cat /proc/interrupts |grep ether; \
> ping -s2800 192.168.0.201 -f -c1000 ; \
> cat /proc/interrupts |grep ether
> 
> For me, before this patch is 2996 interrupts.
> After patch is 2010 interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>

I really don't think this is a good idea at all.

I would instead really rather see you stash away the
status register values into some piece of software state,
and then re-read them before you are about to finish a
NAPI poll cycle.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ