[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5705819A.3030809@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:37:30 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] selinux: avoid nf hooks overhead when not needed
On 4/6/2016 2:51 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Currently, selinux always registers iptables POSTROUTING hooks regarless of
> the running policy needs for any action to be performed by them.
>
> Even the socket_sock_rcv_skb() is always registered, but it can result in a no-op
> depending on the current policy configuration.
>
> The above invocations in the kernel datapath are cause of measurable
> overhead in networking performance test.
>
> This patch series adds explicit notification for netlabel status change
> (other relevant status change, like xfrm and secmark, are already notified to
> LSM) and use this information in selinux to register the above hooks only when
> the current status makes them relevant, deregistering them when no-op
>
> Avoiding the LSM hooks overhead, in netperf UDP_STREAM test with small packets,
> gives about 5% performance improvement on rx and about 8% on tx.
>
> Paolo Abeni (2):
> security: add hook for netlabel status change notification
> selinux: implement support for dynamic net hook [de-]registration
>
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 6 ++++
> include/linux/security.h | 5 +++
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 8 +++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 5 ++-
> security/security.c | 7 ++++
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> security/selinux/include/security.h | 1 +
> security/selinux/ss/services.c | 1 +
> security/selinux/xfrm.c | 4 +++
> 9 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
Is there a patch 1/2?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists