netdev - Re: [patch net-next 0/5] mlxsw: small driver update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160408.130737.1379821883201014485.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:07:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com, eladr@...lanox.com,
	yotamg@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/5] mlxsw: small driver update

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:51:55 +0200

> Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:45:20PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>
>>Cosmetics, in preparation to sharedbuffer patchset.
> 
> Dave, I just realized there is dependency on:
> "devlink: remove implicit type set in port register" which I sent couple
> of minutes after this patchset. I can either resend in bulk, or if you
> could apply in order, that would be great.

The devlink series also lacked a header posting.  Can you just sort this
all out properly and respin everything?

Thanks.

> Thanks and sorry, owe you another beer :)

:-)