[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878u0otc96.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:18:29 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
robbat2@...too.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6, token: allow for clearing the current device token
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> writes:
>
> if (!token)
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (ipv6_addr_any(token))
> - return -EINVAL;
> if (dev->flags & (IFF_LOOPBACK | IFF_NOARP))
> return -EINVAL;
Not directly related to the patch in question. It just made me aware of
this restriction...
I realize that I'm a few years late here, but what's with the IFF_NOARP?
Is that just because we can't do DAD for the token based addresses? How
is that different from manually configuring the whole address?
Bjørn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists