netdev - Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] macb: kill PHY reset code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:57:21 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] macb: kill PHY reset code

Le 12/04/2016 15:54, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit :
> Hello.
> 
> On 4/12/2016 12:22 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> 
>>>> With  the 'phylib' now  being aware of  the "reset-gpios" PHY node property,
>>>> there should be no need to frob the PHY reset in this  driver anymore...
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c |   17 -----------------
>>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h |    1 -
>>>>   2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Index: net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- net-next.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
>>>> +++ net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> [...]
>>>> @@ -2977,18 +2976,6 @@ static int macb_probe(struct platform_de
>>>>   	else
>>>>   		macb_get_hwaddr(bp);
>>>>
>>>> -	/* Power up the PHY if there is a GPIO reset */
>>>> -	phy_node =  of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
>>>> -	if (phy_node) {
>>>> -		int gpio = of_get_named_gpio(phy_node, "reset-gpios", 0);
>>>> -
>>>> -		if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>>> -			bp->reset_gpio = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
>>>> -			gpiod_direction_output(bp->reset_gpio, 1);
>>>
>>> Hi Sergei
>>>
>>> The code you are deleting would of ignored the flags in the gpio
>>
>> I don't parse this.
> 
>> The code deleted does take the flag into account.
> 
>     Not really -- you need to call of_get_named_gpio_flags() (with a valid 
> last argument) for that.

Yep,

>> And the DT property
>> associated to it seems correct to me (I mean, with proper flag
>> specification).
> 
>     It apparently is not as it have GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and the driver assumes 
> active-low reset signal.

Yes, logic was inverted and... anyway, the flag never used for real...
Thanks Sergei.

No problem for me accepting a patch for the at91-vinco.dts.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre