netdev - Re: [RFC] Is it a bug for nfs on udp6 mode or kernel?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1460564226.10638.28.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:17:06 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc:	linux-nfs-approval@...r.kernel.org, tom@...bertland.com,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.u, chuck.lever@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Is it a bug for nfs on udp6 mode or kernel?

On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 19:28 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> Hi everyone:
> 
> I have met this problem when I try to test udp6 for nfs connection, my environment is:
> 
> Server:
> kernel: 4.1.15
> IP:xxxx::36/64
> MTU:1500
> Setting: /etc/exports:/home/nfs *(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash)
> 
> Client:
> kernel: 4.1.18
> IP:xxxx::90/64
> MTU:1500
> command: mount -t nfs -o vers=3,proto=udp6,rsize=4096,wsize=4096 [xxxx::36]:/home/nfs /home/tmp
> 
> I check the nfs parameter configuration, it looks fine and could work well for proto=tcp6.
> 
> Then I have mount correctly and try to run the command "ls", it hang.
> 
> When I use the rsize=1024 and wsize=1024 to mount, the problem disappeared, so I guess it is the problem for GSO or GRO for UDP。
> 
> Then I try to debug the problem, first I tcpdump the package from cline to server, and found that
> the client have send readdirplus message to server correctly, and then the Server send a 4k package
> to client(the big package will frag to 4 package by GSO), till now it looks fine, and the Client Nic could
> receive the 4 skb then send to upper stack to ipv6 and udp, I found the incoming 4 package has been merged
> to one and send to upper stack just like sunrpc, but I try to open the rpc_debug, it looks that the rpc could
> not receive message.
> 
> 
> I built a simple demo to test the udp stack, use the client socket to send big package to server socket, it work well,
> so I think the udp is fine, maybe the bug is in sunrpc.
> 
> The test is very simple, does any body met the same problem like me, thanks for any suggestion.
> 
> Ding 

Have you tried to disable UFO ?

ethtool -K eth... ufo off