[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570E9E8D.50007@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:31:25 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org,
Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, gavidov@...eaurora.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, andrew@...n.ch,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [v4] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller
driver
kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c: In function 'emac_mac_up':
>>> >>drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/emac/emac-mac.c:1076:9: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
> writel(~DIS_INT, adpt->base + EMAC_INT_STATUS);
This doesn't happen on arm64, and I don't know how to fix it. DIS_INT
is defined as:
#define DIS_INT BIT(31)
It seems silly to add a typecast to DIS_INT.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists