[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160413135511.4e683440@xeon-e3>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:55:11 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] ss: 64bit inode numbers
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:22:29 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Lets prepare for a possibility to have 64bit inode numbers for sockets,
> even if the kernel currently enforces 32bit numbers.
>
> Presumably, if both kernel and userland are 64bit (no 32bit emulation),
> kernel could switch to 64bit inode numbers soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Why not use ino_t rather than __u64 which is really intended for kernel/user abi.
Then make code generic on sizeof inode type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists