[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160414.164509.673278059146942229.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kafai@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, weiwan@...gle.com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 0/4] ipv6: datagram: Update dst cache of a
connected udp sk during pmtu update
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:29:33 -0700
> v2:
> ~ Protect __sk_dst_get() operations with rcu_read_lock in
> release_cb() because another thread may do ip6_dst_store()
> for a udp sk without taking the sk lock (e.g. in sendmsg).
> ~ Do a ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_daddr) check before
> calling ip6_datagram_dst_update() in patch 3 and 4. It is
> similar to how __ip6_datagram_connect handles it.
> ~ One fix in ip6_datagram_dst_update() in patch 2. It needs
> to check (np->flow_label & IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK) before
> doing fl6_sock_lookup. I was confused with the naming
> of IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK and IPV6_FLOWINFO_MASK.
> ~ Check dst->obsolete just on the safe side, although I think it
> should at least have DST_OBSOLETE_FORCE_CHK by now.
> ~ Add Fixes tag to patch 3 and 4
> ~ Add some points from the previous discussion about holding
> sk lock to the commit message in patch 3.
>
> v1:
> There is a case in connected UDP socket such that
> getsockopt(IPV6_MTU) will return a stale MTU value. The reproducible
> sequence could be the following:
> 1. Create a connected UDP socket
> 2. Send some datagrams out
> 3. Receive a ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG
> 4. No new outgoing datagrams to trigger the sk_dst_check()
> logic to update the sk->sk_dst_cache.
> 5. getsockopt(IPV6_MTU) returns the mtu from the invalid
> sk->sk_dst_cache instead of the newly created RTF_CACHE clone.
>
> Patch 1 and 2 are the prep work.
> Patch 3 and 4 are the fixes.
Series applied, thanks Martin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists