[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160415.172254.1148340547086083909.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:22:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: saeedm@....mellanox.co.il
Cc: saeedm@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com, talal@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next V1 0/2] mlx5_core: mlx5_ifc updates
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 20:10:07 +0300
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dave and Doug
>>
>> Changes form V0:
>> - 2nd patch commit message fixes.
>>
>> This series include mlx5_core updates for both net-next and rdma
>> trees for 4.7 kernel cycle. This is the only shared code planned
>> for 4.7 between rdma and net trees. Hopefully, this will prevent
>> future conflicts when merging between ib-next and net-next once
>> 4.7 cycle is over and merge window is opened.
>>
>> Both Mellanox rdma and net submissions will proceed once this series
>> is applied into both trees.
>>
>> Future shared code will be sent to both maintainers as pull requests
>> from Mellanox's kernel.org tree.
>>
>> We have included all the maintainers of respective drivers.
>> Kindly review the change and let us know in case of any review comments.
>>
>> Saeed Mahameed (1):
>> net/mlx5: Update mlx5_ifc hardware features
>>
>> Tariq Toukan (1):
>> net/mlx5: Fix mlx5 ifc cmd_hca_cap bad offsets
>>
>> include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> This series is still in "Changes Requested" state in patchwork, but
> there is nothing to change here.
> I will be glad if you give it a shot, it is blocking all of our mlx5
> activities for both net and rdma trees.
Series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists