lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 16 Apr 2016 00:45:59 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Ensure the state machine is called when phy is
 UP

On 16/04/2016 at 00:30:26 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote :
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:17:11AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 16/04/2016 at 00:05:08 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote :
> > > > Trace without my patch:
> > > > libphy: MACB_mii_bus: probed
> > > > macb f8020000.ethernet eth0: Cadence GEM rev 0x00020120 at 0xf8020000 irq 27 (fc:c2:3d:0c:6e:05)
> > > > Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091 f8020000.etherne:01: attached PHY driver [Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091] (mii_bus:phy_addr=f8020000.etherne:01, irq=171)
> > > > Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091 f8020000.etherne:01: PHY state change READY -> READY
> > > > [...]
> > > > Micrel KSZ8081 or KSZ8091 f8020000.etherne:01: PHY state change READY -> READY
> > > 
> > > Are there some state changes before this? How is it getting to state
> > > READY? It would expect it to start in DOWN, from when the phy device
> > > was created in phy_device_create().
> > > 
> > 
> > No other changes. I forgot to mention that this is when booting with a
> > cable plugged in. Unplugging and replugging the cable makes the link
> > detection work fine even without the patch.
> 
> Are you tftpbooting? I.e. has the boot loader already done an auto
> negotiation?
> 

Yes.

> I've looked at the code and i still don't see how it gets to READY.
> What i do see is that when you connect the phy to the MAC, the
> interrupt handler is installed. So maybe there are some PHY interrupts
> before the interface is opened? Could you put a print in
> phy_interrupt().
> 

That is indeed the case, and I'm not sure why because
99f81afc139c6edd14d77a91ee91685a414a1c66 is trying to disable AN at
boot.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ