lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5712D171.70907@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:57:37 -0700 From: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net][PATCH v2 0/2] RDS: couple of fixes for 4.6 On 4/16/2016 3:53 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:43:25 -0700 > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux.git for_4.6/net/rds-fixes > > I have no idea how you set this up, but there is no WAY this can be > pulled from by me. > Thought I did based it against 'net' after your last comment. Just checked again and the 'net' remote added by me points to wrong url(net-next). > When I try to pull it into 'net' I get 2690 objects. That means you > didn't base it upon the 'net' tree which you must do. You can't base > it upon Linus's tree, because if you do I'll get a ton of changes that > are absolutely not appropriate to be pulled into my 'net' tree. > > Are you always doing this? Working against Linus's tree instead of > mine? > No, its not Linus's tree. Its yours but not the right one. Sorry for the trouble. Won't happen again. Thanks for picking up the matches from patchworks. Regards, Santosh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists