lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461089206.10638.226.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:06:46 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 7/8] net: ipv4: listified version of ip_rcv

On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 19/04/16 15:50, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > The main problem in UDP stack today is having to lock the socket because
> > of the dumb forward allocation problem.
> I'm not quite sure what you're referring to here, care to educate me?


This was added for memory accounting, commit
95766fff6b9a78d11fc2d3812dd035381690b55d

TCP stack does not reclaim its forward allocations as aggressively.
(It has a concept of 'memory pressure')




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ