netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Merge tx_flags/tskey/txstamp_ack in tcp_collapse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:18:02 -0700
From:	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC:	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.kdev@...il.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Merge
 tx_flags/tskey/txstamp_ack in tcp_collapse_retrans

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:35:52AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
>
> > A bit off topic, I feel like the SKBTX_ACK_TSTAMP and txstamp_ack are sort
> > of redundant but I have not look into the details yet, so not completely
> > sure.  It wwould be a separate cleanup patch if it is the case.
>
> Please read 6b084928baac562ed61866f540a96120e9c9ddb7 changelog ;)
>
> A cache line miss avoidance is critical
I looked at the patch but I probably am missing something :(
Is checking txstamp_ack alone enough and SKBTX_ACK_TSTAMP is not needed
since they are always set together?