[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57163437.2060002@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:35:51 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
<linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 4/8] net: core: Another step of skb receive list
processing
netif_receive_skb_list_internal() now processes a list and hands it
on to the next function.
The code duplication is unfortunate, but the common part between the list
and non-list versions of the function takes a lock (rcu_read_lock()), so
factoring it out would be a little ugly.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 4bb6724..586807d 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4241,6 +4241,14 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
return ret;
}
+static void __netif_receive_skb_list(struct sk_buff_head *list)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
+ __netif_receive_skb(skb);
+}
+
static int netif_receive_skb_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int ret;
@@ -4269,6 +4277,41 @@ static int netif_receive_skb_internal(struct sk_buff *skb)
return ret;
}
+static void netif_receive_skb_list_internal(struct sk_buff_head *list)
+{
+ struct sk_buff_head sublist;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ __skb_queue_head_init(&sublist);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL) {
+ net_timestamp_check(netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
+ if (skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb)) {
+ /* Handled, don't add to sublist */
+ continue;
+ }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+ if (static_key_false(&rps_needed)) {
+ struct rps_dev_flow voidflow, *rflow = &voidflow;
+ int cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
+
+ if (cpu >= 0) {
+ enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu, &rflow->last_qtail);
+ /* Handled, don't add to sublist */
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+ __skb_queue_tail(&sublist, skb);
+ }
+
+ __netif_receive_skb_list(&sublist);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return;
+}
+
/**
* netif_receive_skb - process receive buffer from network
* @skb: buffer to process
@@ -4297,8 +4340,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb);
* @list: list of skbs to process. Must not be shareable (e.g. it may
* be on the stack)
*
- * For now, just calls netif_receive_skb() in a loop, ignoring the
- * return value.
+ * Since return value of netif_receive_skb() is normally ignored, and
+ * wouldn't be meaningful for a list, this function returns void.
*
* This function may only be called from softirq context and interrupts
* should be enabled.
@@ -4309,8 +4352,7 @@ void netif_receive_skb_list(struct sk_buff_head *list)
skb_queue_for_each(skb, list)
trace_netif_receive_skb_list_entry(skb);
- while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
- netif_receive_skb_internal(skb);
+ netif_receive_skb_list_internal(list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb_list);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists