[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5716E123.8040002@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:53:39 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, egrumbach@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_GETSTATS message to
dump link stats
On 4/19/16 1:41 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:23 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> I like this nlattr flag idea, it's opt-in and any tool can be updated
>> to use the new facility.
>
> Right.
>
>> I'd be willing the backport the nlattr flag bit change to all stable
>> releases as well.
>
> I'm not really convinced that helps much - tools still can't really
> rely on the kernel supporting it.
>
> One thing that might work is that a tool might say it only wants to
> support kernels that have this change (assuming we backport it to
> enough kernels etc.); in that case the tool could add some absolutely
> must-have information (like the IFINDEX or whatever, depends on the
> command) with the new flag, this would get rejected since unpatched
> kernels wouldn't understand the flag and wouldn't find that must-have
> information.
>
> Nevertheless, I think it's most reliable with new netlink commands that
> are known to be available only on kernels understand and treating the
> flag correctly.
The kernel can set a flag in the response that it acknowledges the new
attribute/flag. I did that for filtering neigh dumps -- 21fdd092acc7.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists