netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] prism54: isl_38xx: Replace 'struct timeval'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87inz9y0qg.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
Date:	Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:09:11 +0300
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>,
	y2038@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] prism54: isl_38xx: Replace 'struct timeval'

Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:

> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 00:10 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sunday 17 April 2016 14:42:33 Johannes Berg wrote:
>> > 
>> > I was thinking more restrictively of just the stuff that can't even
>> > be built without modifying the sources - like the "#if VERBOSE"
>> > thing.
>>
>> All the DEBUG() statements are inside of this kind of check, so if we
>> remove the #ifdefs, it would be logical to remove the rest of the
>> debugging infrastructure (DEBUG() macros, SHOW_*, pc_debug, maybe
>> more) as well.
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> Maybe we should Cc the maintainer, but I suspect that since the driver
> is marked Obsolete anyway Luis won't care either :)

I'm planning to apply this patch anyway, the debugging infrastructure
removal can be a followup patch. But please let me know if I should drop
this instead.

-- 
Kalle Valo