[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571E5C48.6030001@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:04:56 -0500
From: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
To: Michael Heimpold <mhei@...mpold.de>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethernet: enc28j60: add device tree
support
On 04/25/2016 12:46 PM, Michael Heimpold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Monday 25 April 2016, 10:39:41 schrieben Sie:
>> On 04/24/2016 04:28 PM, Michael Heimpold wrote:
>>> - eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
>>> +
>>> + macaddr = of_get_mac_address(spi->dev.of_node);
>>> + if (macaddr)
>>
>> You should also check if it is a valid MAC for Ethernet, recommend:
>>
>> if (macaddr && is_valid_ether_addr(macaddr))
>>
>
> But of_get_mac_address already takes care of this, see
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/of/of_net.c#L45
> Also it already checks whether spi->dev.of_node is populated at all.
> It returns NULL in both error cases.
> So I prefered to omit both test here.
>
Ah, missed that, no problem here then.
Hmm, I wonder how many other drivers then do this check needlessly..
Time to fire-up Coccinelle :)
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists