netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: ipv6: Delete host routes on an ifdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160425.164227.1599148827995063295.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:42:27 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dsa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mmanning@...cade.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ipv6: Delete host routes on an ifdown

From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:40:26 -0600

> It's unfortunate you want to take that action. Last week I came across
> a prior attempt by Stephen to do this same thing -- keep IPv6
> addresses. That prior attempt was reverted by commit
> 73a8bd74e261. Cumulus, Brocade, and others clearly want this
> capability.

But nobody has implemented it correctly, it doesn't matter who wants
the feature.  That's why it keeps getting reverted.

Also, this testing you are talking about should have happened long
before you submitted that first patch that introduced all of these
regressions.  My observations tell me that the bulk of the testing
happened afterwards and that's why all the regressions are popping up
now.