[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461605628.5535.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:33:48 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] soreuseport: Resolve merge conflict for v4/v6
ordering fix
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 10:42 -0400, Craig Gallek wrote:
> From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
...
> static inline void __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(struct sock *sk, struct hlist_nulls_head *list)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> index fcadb670f50b..b76b0d7e59c1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> @@ -479,7 +479,11 @@ int __inet_hash(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk,
> if (err)
> goto unlock;
> }
> - hlist_add_head_rcu(&sk->sk_node, &ilb->head);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_reuseport &&
> + sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
Nit : alignment was wrong here.
cond1 & cond2 should be aligned as in :
if (cond1 &&
cond2)
> + hlist_add_tail_rcu(&sk->sk_node, &ilb->head);
> + else
> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&sk->sk_node, &ilb->head);
> sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
> sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, 1);
> unlock:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists