[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2064019.8u38J1EmDF@bentobox>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:00:28 +0200
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Antonio Quartulli <a@...table.cc>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org,
Marek Lindner <mareklindner@...mailbox.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] batman-adv: Reduce refcnt of removed router when updating route
On Tuesday 26 April 2016 17:42:54 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > _batadv_update_route rcu_derefences orig_ifinfo->router outside of a
> > spinlock protected region to print some information messages to the debug
> > log. But this pointer is not checked again when the new pointer is assigned
> > in the spinlock protected region. Thus is can happen that the value of
>
> Thus is can? :-)
Yes, my fault. s/is/it/.
[...]
> > spin_lock_bh(&orig_node->neigh_list_lock);
> > + /* curr_router used earlier may not be the current orig_ifinfo->router
> > + * anymore because it was dereferenced outside of the neigh_list_lock
> > + * protected region. After the new best neighbor has replace the current
>
> Replaced.
>
> [...]
This one looks like one of Marek's modifications [1] to the patch. But I would
guess that he has nothing against adding a 'd'.
Should Antonio resent all the patches or is a different approach preferred?
Kind regards,
Sven
[1] https://patchwork.open-mesh.org/patch/15940/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists