[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AFE6B2C1-93B5-4782-870D-2C6C81BF6F52@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 01:06:30 +0800
From: Wang Shanker <shankerwangmiao@...il.com>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip: add udp_csum, udp6_csum_tx, udp6_csum_rx control flags to ip l2tp add tunnel
> 在 2016年4月27日,23:33,Wang Shanker <shankerwangmiao@...il.com> 写道:
>
>
>
>> 在 2016年4月27日,20:21,James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com> 写道:
>>
>> On 26 April 2016 at 15:15, Wang Shanker <shankerwangmiao@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>> It’s my first time to contribute to such an important open source project. Things began when I upgraded my server, called "Server A", form ubuntu 14.04 to 16.04, which is shipped with new kernel version, 4.4. After upgrade, I soon found a l2tp tunnel between this server and another linux server, called "Server B", via ipv6 broke down. Here is the network topology:
>>>
>>> +----------+ +----------+
>>> | Server A | -- IPV6 Network -- | Server B |
>>> +----------+ +----------+
>>>
>>> The l2tp tunnel was encapsulated in udp datagrams. All the configuration was normal and could work after I reverted the kernel on Server A to original version.
>>>
>>> Here is what i did to create the tunnel:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> on Server A:
>>>
>>> ip l2tp add tunnel tunnel_id 86 peer_tunnel_id 86 remote 2001:db8::aaaa local 2001:db8::bbbb udp_sport 1086 udp_dport 1086
>>> ip l2tp add session name l2tpeth0 tunnel_id 86 session_id 86 peer_session_id 86
>>> ip l s l2tpeth0 up
>>>
>>> on Server B:
>>>
>>> ip l2tp add tunnel tunnel_id 86 peer_tunnel_id 86 local 2001:db8::aaaa remote 2001:db8::bbbb udp_sport 1086 udp_dport 1086
>>> ip l2tp add session name l2tpeth0 tunnel_id 86 session_id 86 peer_session_id 86
>>> ip l s l2tpeth0 up
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> When I used tcpdump to diagnose the problem, I got such result:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> on Server A:
>>>
>>> arping -i l2tpeth0 -0 1.2.3.4
>>>
>>> on Server B:
>>>
>>> tcpdump -i eth0 -n port 1086 -v
>>>
>>> 21:35:57.818810 IP6 (flowlabel 0x8f028, hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 62) 2001:db8::aaaa.1086 > 2001:db8::bbbb.1086: [bad udp cksum 0x0000 -> 0x1140!] UDP, length 54
>>> 21:35:58.820572 IP6 (flowlabel 0x8f028, hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 62) 2001:db8::aaaa.1086 > 2001:db8::bbbb.1086: [bad udp cksum 0x0000 -> 0x1140!] UDP, length 54
>>> 21:35:59.822216 IP6 (flowlabel 0x8f028, hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 62) 2001:db8::aaaa.1086 > 2001:db8::bbbb.1086: [bad udp cksum 0x0000 -> 0x1140!] UDP, length 54
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> After looking into kernel source, I found out that in this commit a new feature to set udp6 checksum to zero in commit 6b649fe, which added `L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX` and `L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX`.
>>>
>>> As a result, I added `udp_csum`, `udp6_csum_tx`, `udp6_csum_rx` control flags to `ip l2tp add tunnel` to control those attributes about checksum.
>>>
>>> Using this to create the tunnel instead on Server A:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> ip l2tp add tunnel tunnel_id 86 peer_tunnel_id 86 remote 2001:db8::aaaa local 2001:db8::bbbb udp_sport 1086 udp_dport 1086 udp6_csum_tx on udp6_csum_rx on
>>> ```
>>>
>>> I finally got:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> on Server A:
>>>
>>> arping -i l2tpeth0 -0 1.2.3.4
>>>
>>> on Server B:
>>>
>>> tcpdump -i eth0 -n port 1086 -v
>>>
>>> 22:07:03.844297 IP6 (flowlabel 0x8f028, hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 62) 2001:db8::aaaa.1086 > 2001:db8::bbbb.1086: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 54
>>> 22:07:04.845717 IP6 (flowlabel 0x8f028, hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 62) 2001:db8::aaaa.1086 > 2001:db8::bbbb.1086: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 54
>>> 22:07:05.847965 IP6 (flowlabel 0x8f028, hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 62) 2001:db8::aaaa.1086 > 2001:db8::bbbb.1086: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 54
>>>
>>> tcpdump -i l2tpeth0 -v
>>>
>>> 22:10:35.691326 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 1.2.3.4 tell 0.0.0.0, length 28
>>> 22:10:36.693627 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 1.2.3.4 tell 0.0.0.0, length 28
>>> 22:10:37.695010 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 1.2.3.4 tell 0.0.0.0, length 28
>>> 22:10:38.697121 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 1.2.3.4 tell 0.0.0.0, length 28
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> It seems to work. However, is it the real point that should be fixed and does my patch fix it well? I need your suggestion.
>>
>> This seems reasonable to me. It is good to provide user control of
>> L2TP checksum options.
>>
>> However, there is a problem with your patch. The netlink attributes
>> you are accessing to control checksums are flags, not u8 values.
>
> I’m not so familiar with kernel code. However, in `<linux/l2tp.h>` :
>
> ```
>
> /*
> * ATTR types defined for L2TP
> */
> enum {
> L2TP_ATTR_NONE, /* no data */
> // ...
> L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR, /* struct in6_addr */
> L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX, /* u8 */
> L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX, /* u8 */
> // ...
>
> }
> ```
>
> isn’t L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX a u8 value? Or should I use `addattr` instead of `addattr8`?
>
>>
>> Maybe the default checksum setting for such l2tp tunnels should be
>> changed in the l2tp kernel code to match the previous behaviour where
>> IPv6 checksums were disabled?
>
> I think so. However, I’m confused with those code.
>
> From the name of the attrs `L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX` and `L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX`, I
> can tell that when those flags are set, the checksum will be zero. Also, according to the
> comment of commit 6b649fe in kernel source, “Added new L2TP configuration options to allow
> TX and RX of zero checksums in IPv6. Default is not to use them.”, checksums shouldn't have
> been zero by default. However, in fact, they are. I think there may be some bugs in kernel
> source.
I think I’ve got the bug. Here is the patch for kernel
---
net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
index afca2eb..6edfa99 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
@@ -1376,9 +1376,9 @@ static int l2tp_tunnel_sock_create(struct net *net,
memcpy(&udp_conf.peer_ip6, cfg->peer_ip6,
sizeof(udp_conf.peer_ip6));
udp_conf.use_udp6_tx_checksums =
- cfg->udp6_zero_tx_checksums;
+ ! cfg->udp6_zero_tx_checksums;
udp_conf.use_udp6_rx_checksums =
- cfg->udp6_zero_rx_checksums;
+ ! cfg->udp6_zero_rx_checksums;
} else
#endif
{
--
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> ip/ipl2tp.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/ip/ipl2tp.c b/ip/ipl2tp.c
>>> index 3c8ee93..67a6482 100644
>>> --- a/ip/ipl2tp.c
>>> +++ b/ip/ipl2tp.c
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ struct l2tp_parm {
>>>
>>> uint16_t pw_type;
>>> uint16_t mtu;
>>> + int udp6_csum_tx:1;
>>> + int udp6_csum_rx:1;
>>> int udp_csum:1;
>>> int recv_seq:1;
>>> int send_seq:1;
>>> @@ -117,6 +119,9 @@ static int create_tunnel(struct l2tp_parm *p)
>>> if (p->encap == L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_UDP) {
>>> addattr16(&req.n, 1024, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_SPORT, p->local_udp_port);
>>> addattr16(&req.n, 1024, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_DPORT, p->peer_udp_port);
>>> + addattr8 (&req.n, 1024, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_CSUM, p->udp_csum);
>>> + addattr8 (&req.n, 1024, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX, p->udp6_csum_tx);
>>> + addattr8 (&req.n, 1024, L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX, p->udp6_csum_rx);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (rtnl_talk(&genl_rth, &req.n, NULL, 0) < 0)
>>> @@ -282,6 +287,14 @@ static int get_response(struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)
>>> p->l2spec_len = rta_getattr_u8(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_L2SPEC_LEN]);
>>>
>>> p->udp_csum = !!attrs[L2TP_ATTR_UDP_CSUM];
>>> + if (attrs[L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX])
>>> + p->udp6_csum_tx = rta_getattr_u8(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_TX]);
>>> + else
>>> + p->udp6_csum_tx = 1;
>>> + if (attrs[L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX])
>>> + p->udp6_csum_rx = rta_getattr_u8(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_UDP_ZERO_CSUM6_RX]);
>>> + else
>>> + p->udp6_csum_rx = 1;
>>> if (attrs[L2TP_ATTR_COOKIE])
>>> memcpy(p->cookie, RTA_DATA(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_COOKIE]),
>>> p->cookie_len = RTA_PAYLOAD(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_COOKIE]));
>>> @@ -470,6 +483,9 @@ static void usage(void)
>>> fprintf(stderr, " tunnel_id ID peer_tunnel_id ID\n");
>>> fprintf(stderr, " [ encap { ip | udp } ]\n");
>>> fprintf(stderr, " [ udp_sport PORT ] [ udp_dport PORT ]\n");
>>> + fprintf(stderr, " [ udp_csum { on | off } ]\n");
>>> + fprintf(stderr, " [ udp6_csum_tx { on | off } ]\n");
>>> + fprintf(stderr, " [ udp6_csum_rx { on | off } ]\n");
>>> fprintf(stderr, "Usage: ip l2tp add session [ name NAME ]\n");
>>> fprintf(stderr, " tunnel_id ID\n");
>>> fprintf(stderr, " session_id ID peer_session_id ID\n");
>>> @@ -500,6 +516,8 @@ static int parse_args(int argc, char **argv, int cmd, struct l2tp_parm *p)
>>> /* Defaults */
>>> p->l2spec_type = L2TP_L2SPECTYPE_DEFAULT;
>>> p->l2spec_len = 4;
>>> + p->udp6_csum_rx = 1;
>>> + p->udp6_csum_tx = 1;
>>>
>>> while (argc > 0) {
>>> if (strcmp(*argv, "encap") == 0) {
>>> @@ -569,6 +587,33 @@ static int parse_args(int argc, char **argv, int cmd, struct l2tp_parm *p)
>>> if (get_u16(&uval, *argv, 0))
>>> invarg("invalid port\n", *argv);
>>> p->peer_udp_port = uval;
>>> + } else if (strcmp(*argv, "udp_csum") == 0) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (strcmp(*argv, "on") == 0) {
>>> + p->udp_csum = 1;
>>> + } else if (strcmp(*argv, "off") == 0) {
>>> + p->udp_csum = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + invarg("invalid option for udp_csum\n", *argv);
>>> + }
>>> + } else if (strcmp(*argv, "udp6_csum_rx") == 0) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (strcmp(*argv, "on") == 0) {
>>> + p->udp6_csum_rx = 1;
>>> + } else if (strcmp(*argv, "off") == 0) {
>>> + p->udp6_csum_rx = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + invarg("invalid option for udp6_csum_rx\n", *argv);
>>> + }
>>> + } else if (strcmp(*argv, "udp6_csum_tx") == 0) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (strcmp(*argv, "on") == 0) {
>>> + p->udp6_csum_tx = 1;
>>> + } else if (strcmp(*argv, "off") == 0) {
>>> + p->udp6_csum_tx = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + invarg("invalid option for udp6_csum_tx\n", *argv);
>>> + }
>>> } else if (strcmp(*argv, "offset") == 0) {
>>> __u8 uval;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists