[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5720671C.9040406@atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:15:40 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: VInCo: fix phy reset gpio flag
Le 26/04/2016 20:27, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit :
> On 04/26/2016 08:17 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
>>> I plan to queue this patch through arm-soc for 4.7.
>>
>> Ok.
>
> How about this patch going thru your net-next repo instead?
> I'd like to keep the kernel bisectable... if my phylib/macb patches get merged
> earlier than this one, that board would be broken...
Sergei, David,
I don't think that there is a big risk for this board to be tested in
the meantime as it's not widely deployed yet.
And as I'm aware of the issue and basically maintaining this DT file, I
think that I'll be informed if people try an unlikely arrangement of
patches on this board.
So either way, I'm okay. But I do think it's not worth thinking too much
about this case.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists