netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG832pxsRd0zcDHGxpfFPswf2wSCySz1ymdiS5nCH1c3pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:13:39 +0300
From:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   d8edd2469ace ("et/mlx5e: Fix minimum MTU")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
>   0e405443e803 ("net/mlx5e: Improve set features ndo resiliency")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> index 67d548b70e14,5bad17d37d7b..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@@ -2025,9 -2214,49 +2240,52 @@@ static int set_feature_rx_vlan(struct n
>         return err;
>   }
>
> + static int mlx5e_handle_feature(struct net_device *netdev,
> +                               netdev_features_t wanted_features,
> +                               netdev_features_t feature,
> +                               mlx5e_feature_handler feature_handler)
> + {
> +       netdev_features_t changes = wanted_features ^ netdev->features;
> +       bool enable = !!(wanted_features & feature);
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (!(changes & feature))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       err = feature_handler(netdev, enable);
> +       if (err) {
> +               netdev_err(netdev, "%s feature 0x%llx failed err %d\n",
> +                          enable ? "Enable" : "Disable", feature, err);
> +               return err;
> +       }
> +
> +       MLX5E_SET_FEATURE(netdev, feature, enable);
> +       return 0;
> + }
> +
> + static int mlx5e_set_features(struct net_device *netdev,
> +                             netdev_features_t features)
> + {
> +       int err;
> +
> +       err  = mlx5e_handle_feature(netdev, features, NETIF_F_LRO,
> +                                   set_feature_lro);
> +       err |= mlx5e_handle_feature(netdev, features,
> +                                   NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER,
> +                                   set_feature_vlan_filter);
> +       err |= mlx5e_handle_feature(netdev, features, NETIF_F_HW_TC,
> +                                   set_feature_tc_num_filters);
> +       err |= mlx5e_handle_feature(netdev, features, NETIF_F_RXALL,
> +                                   set_feature_rx_all);
> +       err |= mlx5e_handle_feature(netdev, features, NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX,
> +                                   set_feature_rx_vlan);
> +
> +       return err ? -EINVAL : 0;
> + }
> +
>  +#define MXL5_HW_MIN_MTU 64
>  +#define MXL5E_MIN_MTU (MXL5_HW_MIN_MTU + ETH_FCS_LEN)
>  +
>   static int mlx5e_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
>   {
>         struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> @@@ -2633,18 -2966,10 +2997,19 @@@ static void mlx5e_destroy_netdev(struc
>         schedule_work(&priv->set_rx_mode_work);
>         mlx5e_disable_async_events(priv);
>         flush_scheduled_work();
>  -      unregister_netdev(netdev);
>  +      if (test_bit(MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_SHUTDOWN, &mdev->intf_state)) {
>  +              netif_device_detach(netdev);
>  +              mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
>  +              if (test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_OPENED, &priv->state))
>  +                      mlx5e_close_locked(netdev);
>  +              mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
>  +      } else {
>  +              unregister_netdev(netdev);
>  +      }
>  +
>         mlx5e_tc_cleanup(priv);
>         mlx5e_vxlan_cleanup(priv);
> +       mlx5e_destroy_q_counter(priv);
>         mlx5e_destroy_flow_tables(priv);
>         mlx5e_destroy_tirs(priv);
>         mlx5e_destroy_rqt(priv, MLX5E_SINGLE_RQ_RQT);

Looks good, and it is pretty straightforward.
Dave will have to take all hunks from both patches, same as you did.

Thank you Stephen.

Saeed.