[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160428164046.0998f03d@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:40:46 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
bblanco@...mgrid.com, borkmann@...earbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V4 1/5] samples/bpf: add back functionality to
redefine LLC command
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:51:33 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Add this features back. Note that it is possible to redefine the LLC
> > on the make command like:
> >
> > make samples/bpf/ LLC=~/git/llvm/build/bin/llc
>
> I don't have an objection to this patch, but you didn't explain why/how
> this approach is better than just doing:
> PATH=~/git/llvm/build/bin make samples/bpf/
It is almost the same. There is always another way to do the same.
I explicitly use this to test different combinations of LLC and CLANG,
in-order to validate Alexei's claim that older versions of CLANG could
still work with a newer version of LLC. Thus, one use-case you
approach cannot cover ;-)
And clang seems to install a clang-3.9, which my solution also covers
by explicitly specifying CLANG=clang-3.9, if several avail clang's are
in the PATH.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists