[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160428165349.GB81443@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:53:50 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...nd.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...atatu.com>,
Vincent Jardin <vincent.jardin@...nd.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2: bash completion function for tc
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> Hi Alexei, Stephen,
>
> 2016-04-27 (22:13 UTC-0700) ~ Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:19:26 -0700
> > Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:28:17AM +0200, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >>> Hi Jamal, Stephen,
> >>>
> >>> I searched for a function providing auto-completion for `tc` utility in
> >>> bash, but I found none. So I have created one, and I would like share it
> >>> with the community. It is available here:
> >>> https://github.com/6WIND/tc_bash-completion/blob/master/tc
> >>> I would like to make it easily available to tc users, so here is a
> >>> twofold request:
> >>>
> >>> * I do not know where to submit the code. Should I submit here on netdev
> >>> for inclusion in iproute2 package, or rather to the bash-completion
> >>> repository on GitHub? I feel like it would receive better feedback and
> >>> updates if pushed to iproute2. Could you please provide some advice here?
> >>> * The completion for `tc` seems to work well; I have tested it with many
> >>> commands, but I am no tc expert, and there are probably some cases where
> >>> the completion fails to propose the correct choices. I would be really
> >>> interested in any feedback/bug reports that you, or anyone on this list
> >>> who uses tc, could provide.
> >>
> >> that looks very interesting.
> >> I think making it a part of iproute2 is a good thing.
> >> How about installing it into /etc/iproute2/ ?
> >> Stephen, any comments?
> >>
> >
> > I am ok with keeping it in the repository.
> > But it would need to be installed in the standard bash directory,
> > is that distro dependent?
> >
>
> As far as I know the bash-completion directory is not distro dependent,
> but it moved at some point (2011) from /etc/bash_completion.d/ to
> /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/. While backward compatibility is
> provided with the former location, it is now recommended to use the latter.
>
> So one idea could be to check (in iproute2 Makefile) for existence of
> /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/ directory, and if not found to
> fall back to /etc/bash_completion.d/. If none is found, use
> /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/. Does this seem correct?
make sense to me.
For some reason there is also /etc/bash-completion.d/ (note - vs _)
and git installs there (which seems to be a bug), but your proposal is good as-is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists