[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160427.231008.616243718482885421.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: avoid some atomic ops when FASYNC is
not used
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:39:31 -0700
> We can avoid some atomic operations on sockets not using FASYNC
I guess a user can do weird things and set/clear the FASYNC bit in the
middle of the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_ bit being set, and reset the FASYNC bit
later and the SOCKWQ_* state is stale.
However, that's probably not worth handling explicitly.
Series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists