netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH1o70JrqnBJfDvcrgpONnXpPPY1BtFW+tYVjAxcs8S-g_voNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 May 2016 23:34:26 +0900
From:	Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@...il.com>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

Hi Simon-san,

Thank you for testing this patch!

Thanks,
kaneko

2016-04-29 8:34 GMT+09:00 Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>:
> Hi Sergei, Hi Kaneko-san,
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:14:41PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 04/24/2016 07:16 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote:
>>
>> >From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
>> >
>> >Aligning the reception data size is not required.
>>
>>    OK, the gen 2/3 manuals indeed don't require this. I assume the patch has
>> been tested...
>
> This morning I tested this patch applied on net-next using the
> r8a7795/salvator-x  (Gen-3). My test was to boot to a user-space prompt
> using NFS root which was successful. I can run further tests on this setup
> if it would be useful.
>
> Unfortunately I do not have access to hardware to allow me to test this
> on Gen-2.
>
>> >Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@...il.com>
>
> Tested-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
>
>>    I have a few comments though...
>
> [...]