netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 5/9] mlx4: Add support for UDP tunnel segmentation with outer checksum offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMiog9zEwg_S=jG5LjM6FpvtyffvPcYX_G4j-ubBE_wLDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 May 2016 23:35:04 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
Cc:	"talal@...lanox.com" <talal@...lanox.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	michael.chan@...adcom.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 5/9] mlx4: Add support for UDP tunnel
 segmentation with outer checksum offload

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com> wrote:
> This patch assumes that the mlx4 hardware will ignore existing IPv4/v6
> header fields for length and checksum as well as the length and checksum
> fields for outer UDP headers.

Hi Alex,

I see now the above text appearing in bunch of similar commit of
yours, specifically to Intel drivers and mlx5... could you please
elaborate a bit more what you mean here and what are the practical
consequences of that characteristics?

I got that right NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM means that the HW can do
segmentation for TCP packets encapsulated by UDP tunnel e.g VXLAN
where the outer checksum is not zero. AFAIK, any other outer checksum
value can't correctly be a constant... are you assuming here  RCO or
LCO?

Or.