[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160502.163140.11281931277716285.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 16:31:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eladr@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE optimizations
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 13:23:27 -0700
> It looks like net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c should set SOCK_FASYNC
> even if it is not actually using fasync_list
>
> Could you try this quick hack to check if this is the right way ?
Indeed, it tests the ASYNC bit without enabling FASYNC.
There are three other places that do this: macvtap, tun, dlm lowcomms.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists