lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160502.163140.11281931277716285.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 16:31:40 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@...il.com Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eladr@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE optimizations From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 13:23:27 -0700 > It looks like net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c should set SOCK_FASYNC > even if it is not actually using fasync_list > > Could you try this quick hack to check if this is the right way ? Indeed, it tests the ASYNC bit without enabling FASYNC. There are three other places that do this: macvtap, tun, dlm lowcomms.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists