netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: hns: update DT properties according to Rob's comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160503.123750.1357220927373693471.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 03 May 2016 12:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	robh@...nel.org
Cc:	Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, yankejian@...wei.com,
	huangdaode@...ilicon.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
	lipeng321@...wei.com, liguozhu@...wei.com, xieqianqian@...wei.com,
	xuwei5@...ilicon.com, linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: hns: update DT properties according
 to Rob's comments

From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:24:44 -0500

> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:39:49PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Yisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com>
>> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:09:00 +0800
>> 
>> > There are some inappropriate properties definition in hns DT. We update the definition
>> > according to Rob's review comments and fix some typos in binding.
>> > 
>> > For more details, please see individual patches.
>> 
>> Series applied, thanks.
> 
> It would be nice to review patches addressing my comments before they 
> get applied. Can you please give series with DT bindings a few more days 
> for review before applying.

I can't go more than a day or so days, I refuse to let patches rot in
my backlog for more than that.  I get sometimes a hundred new patch
submissions a day and what you are asking me to do would make maintainence
untenable for everyone, sorry.

Just be quicker on the review, then there are no problems.