[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462320650.5535.334.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:10:50 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATC net-next] tcp: must block bh in __inet_twsk_hashdance()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
__inet_twsk_hashdance() might be called from process context,
better block BH before acquiring bind hash and established locks
Fixes: c10d9310edf5 ("tcp: do not assume TCP code is non preemptible")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
index 99ee5c4a9b6844929a995b0b4b5bd693bb211123..2065816748066986f0356df168c2d76fe2d53d85 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void inet_twsk_add_bind_node(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw,
}
/*
- * Enter the time wait state. This is called with locally disabled BH.
+ * Enter the time wait state.
* Essentially we whip up a timewait bucket, copy the relevant info into it
* from the SK, and mess with hash chains and list linkage.
*/
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void __inet_twsk_hashdance(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sock *sk,
*/
bhead = &hashinfo->bhash[inet_bhashfn(twsk_net(tw), inet->inet_num,
hashinfo->bhash_size)];
- spin_lock(&bhead->lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&bhead->lock);
tw->tw_tb = icsk->icsk_bind_hash;
WARN_ON(!icsk->icsk_bind_hash);
inet_twsk_add_bind_node(tw, &tw->tw_tb->owners);
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void __inet_twsk_hashdance(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sock *sk,
if (__sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(sk))
sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
- spin_unlock(lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__inet_twsk_hashdance);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists