netdev - Re: [PATC net-next] tcp: must block bh in __inet_twsk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 May 2016 17:06:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATC net-next] tcp: must block bh in __inet_twsk_hashdance()

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 11:22:11 -0700

> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:54 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:10:50 -0700
>> 
>> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> > 
>> > __inet_twsk_hashdance() might be called from process context,
>> > better block BH before acquiring bind hash and established locks
>> > 
>> > Fixes: c10d9310edf5 ("tcp: do not assume TCP code is non preemptible")
>> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> 
>> Applied.
> 
> David, I do not see these two patches in net-next ?
> 
> (This one, and the "tcp: fix lockdep splat in tcp_snd_una_update()" one)

I pushed them in by hand, they should really be there now.

Thanks for letting me know.