lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2016 16:51:15 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <>
Cc:, John Stultz <>,
	Deepa Dinamani <>,, lkml <>,
	Alexander Viro <>,
	"" <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	"David S. Miller" <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Eliezer Tamir <>,
	Arjan van de Ven <>,
	Oleg Nesterov <>
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [RESEND PATCH 2/3] fs: poll/select/recvmmsg: use
 timespec64 for timeout events

On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <> wrote:

> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks
> > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer
> > acks before I add it to my tree.
> Agreed. Feel free to add my
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <>
> at least (whoever picks it up).

In reply to [1/3] John said

: Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing,
: however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two
: patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so
: they can go via another tree?

However none of the patches are in linux-next.

John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward
substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing

I'll grab the patches for now to get them some external testing.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists