[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160504103549.228c9e8a@griffin>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:35:49 +0200
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: tom@...bertland.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next-next 2/7] gre: Move utility functions to common
headers
On Wed, 04 May 2016 00:53:16 -0400 (EDT), David Miller wrote:
> From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:29:44 +0200
>
> > How do we resolve the conflict between net and net-next? I'd prefer
> > gre_parse_header to return the header length. I can submit a patch for
> > net-next that does this; that would substantially ease the merge.
>
> Jiri, I just did the net --> net-next merge. Please send me something on
> top of that which does what you like.
The patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/617940/ still applies and
does the right thing even post merge.
Note that the merge reintroduced the bug fixed by b7f8fe251e46 (the
mentioned patch fixes this, too).
Thanks,
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists