[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1462368113-5493-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@docker.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:21:53 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...ker.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...ker.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andy King <acking@...are.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH] VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only
The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a
shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems
wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR.
Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown
here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have
had any adverse effects that I can see.
I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact
on the vmci transport.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...ker.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy King <acking@...are.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 21 +--------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 1e5f5ed..7a25150 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1789,27 +1789,8 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
err = 0;
- if (copied > 0) {
- /* We only do these additional bookkeeping/notification steps
- * if we actually copied something out of the queue pair
- * instead of just peeking ahead.
- */
-
- if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
- /* If the other side has shutdown for sending and there
- * is nothing more to read, then modify the socket
- * state.
- */
- if (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) {
- if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0) {
- sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE);
- sk->sk_state_change(sk);
- }
- }
- }
+ if (copied > 0)
err = copied;
- }
out:
release_sock(sk);
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists