[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201605041336.u44DaCGZ029899@d06av12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:35:51 +0000
From: "Evgeny Cherkashin" <Eugene.Crosser@...ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: crosser@...rage.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] igmp: fix byte order in /proc/net/igmp output
-----Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: -----
>To: Evgeny Cherkashin/Russia/IBM@...RU
>From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>Date: 2016-05-04 16:13
>Cc: crosser@...rage.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net] igmp: fix byte order in /proc/net/igmp
>output
>
>On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 14:11 +0200, Eugene Crosser wrote:
>> /proc/net/igmp is a readonly attribute that shows multicast groups
>> to which different network interfaces are subscribed. Among other
>> things, it displays `multiaddr` which is a 32 bit
>network-byte-order
>> field, in hexadecimal format. Prior to this patch, the field was
>> displayed as an integer, resulting in reverse byte order on little
>> endian architectures. This patch converts it with ntohl() for
>display
>> the same way as this is done for the /proc/net/mcfilter attribute.
>>
>> The patch changes (corrects) user-visible behaviour.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eugene Crosser <Eugene.Crosser@...ibm.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/igmp.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> index b3086cf..f9d2139 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> @@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ static int igmp_mc_seq_show(struct seq_file
>*seq, void *v)
>> delta = im->timer.expires - jiffies;
>> seq_printf(seq,
>> "\t\t\t\t%08X %5d %d:%08lX\t\t%d\n",
>> - im->multiaddr, im->users,
>> + ntohl(im->multiaddr), im->users,
>> im->tm_running,
>> im->tm_running ? jiffies_delta_to_clock_t(delta) : 0,
>> im->reporter);
>
>
>I do not believe we can change this. This is unfortunately too late.
>
>/proc/net/tcp has the same 'issue' or if you prefer, well known
>behavior.
>
>Such change would break basically all /proc/net/igmp users.
I understand that. It is unfortunate though that the byte order is not _just_ wrong, it's _different_ on BE and LE machines...
Oh well.
Thanks,
Eugene
Powered by blists - more mailing lists